Lockwood

(PC) Rood v. Lockwood

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20252:19-cv-01806California1,130 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Colton James Rood, No. 2:19-cv-1806 KJM AC P Plaintiff, ORDER v. Lockwood, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 26, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Findings & Recommendations (F. & R.), ECF No. 101. Defendants filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Defs.’ Obj., ECF No. 104. Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the court allow 25 him to file late responses. Mot. Late Responses, ECF No. 107. Plaintiff then filed untimely and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.