Lockwood

(PC) Rood v. Lockwood

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20252:19-cv-01806California1,130 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Colton James Rood, No. 2:19-cv-1806 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. Lockwood, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 | under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 | by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 26, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 | were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 | findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Findings & 23 | Recommendations (F. & R.), ECF No. 101. Defendants filed objections to the findings and 24 | recommendations. Defs.’ Obj., ECF No. 104. Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the court allow 25 | him to file late responses. Mot. Late Responses, ECF No. 107. Plaintiff then filed untimely and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.