City of Huntington Beach v. Gavin Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20258:24-cv-02017California6,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,

Case No. 8:24-cv-02017 CBM (JDEx) a California Charter City, and Municipal Corporation; PARENTS 1A-9A, Plaintiffs, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER v.

GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; and TONY 18 THURMOND, in his official capacity as California State Superintendent of Public Instruction, 20 Defendants.

Based on the parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 59) and for good cause shown, the Court finds and orders as follows. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted. 27 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 28 following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.