(PS) Hedrington v. David Grant Medical Center
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ORLONZO HEDRINGTON,
12 Plaintiff, No. 2:23-cv-00801-TLN-CKD
13 14 v. ORDER DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER, et 15 al., 16 Defendants,
17
18 19 20 21 22 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Orlonzo Hendrington’s (“Plaintiff”) 23 request for the case to be reversed, set for trial, or proceed to settlement. (ECF No. 79.) For the 24 reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the request.
25 26 27 28 1 Judgment was entered in this civil rights action on March 28, 2024. (ECF Nos. 62, 63.) 2 Plaintiff then filed three motions for relief from judgment, (ECF Nos. 64, 67, 73), and a motion to 3 set aside judgment, (ECF No. 77), which this Court construed as a motion for relief under Federal 4 Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b). (ECF No. 78 at 2.) After detailing the facts and 5 procedural history, which the Court incorporates by reference here, the undersigned denied 6 Plaintiff’s various motions for relief. (Id.) Plaintiff has now filed another request for relief under…