Ahadzia

(PC) Foust v. Ahadzia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20252:24-cv-00950California395 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARL FOUST, No. 2:24-cv-0950-SCR-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 AHMAD AHADZIA, et al., ORDER 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without an attorney, has filed a third amended 18 complaint in this pending civil rights action. ECF No. 59. In the third amended complaint, 19 plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants employed at California State Prison, 20 Los Angeles County (LAC). 21 The federal venue statute provides that a civil action “may be brought in (1) a judicial 22 district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the 23 district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions 24 giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action 25 is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in 26 this action, any judicial district in which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.