Farhat

(PC) Harper v. Farhat

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20252:24-cv-02644California2,631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARCY HARPER, No. 2:24-cv-2644 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ALEX FARHAT, et al., Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (ECF No. 14.) For the following reasons, this Court recommends dismissal of plaintiff’s claim alleging that defendant Ekinim violated the Eighth Amendment when she gave plaintiff the wrong dose of insulin. This Court separately orders service of the remaining claims raised in the second amended complaint: 1) claim one alleging that defendant Farhat failed to treat plaintiff for side effects caused by the Covid-19 vaccine; 2) claim three alleging that defendant Singh failed to refer plaintiff to wound care for treatment of plaintiff’s right foot; and 3) claim four alleging that defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.