Farhat
(PC) Harper v. Farhat
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARCY HARPER, No. 2:24-cv-2644 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
14 ALEX FARHAT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (ECF 20 No. 14.) For the following reasons, this Court recommends dismissal of plaintiff’s claim alleging 21 that defendant Ekinim violated the Eighth Amendment when she gave plaintiff the wrong dose of 22 insulin. This Court separately orders service of the remaining claims raised in the second 23 amended complaint: 1) claim one alleging that defendant Farhat failed to treat plaintiff for side 24 effects caused by the Covid-19 vaccine; 2) claim three alleging that defendant Singh failed to 25 refer plaintiff to wound care for treatment of plaintiff’s right foot; and 3) claim four alleging that 26 defendant…