(PS) County of Nevada v. Wild Earth Property, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20252:24-cv-03245California266 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COUNTY OF NEVADA, No. 2:24-cv-03245-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 WILD EARTH PROPERTY, LLC, et al., (ECF No. 3) 15 Defendants. 16 17 On December 4, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 18 recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on the parties and which contained 19 notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 20 within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes 21 that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th 22 Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt 23 v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 24 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause 25 appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and 26 recommendations in full. 27 //// 28 //// 1 | Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.