(HC) Iseli v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20252:24-cv-03159California357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDEN WILLIE ISELI, No. 2:24-cv-3159 DJC AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER WILLIAM D JOHNSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 19, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 3. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.