Mull

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HENRY ORTIZ, No. 2:25-cv-0028-DC-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 DOUG V. MULL, et al. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Henry Ortiz initiated this action on January 2, 2025, with a pro se complaint and 18 a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Plaintiff’s application to proceed 19 in forma pauperis makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and the request is granted. 20 This matter was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 21 636(b)(1). 22 On January 8, 2025, plaintiff filed a petition for injunctive relief which the court construes 23 as seeking a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction under Rule 65(b) of the 24 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 3.) On January 16, 2025, this case was reassigned to 25 the undersigned magistrate judge. (ECF No. 5.) For the reasons set forth below, the complaint 26 fails to…