Mull

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY ORTIZ, No. 2:25-cv-0028-DC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND DOUG V. MULL, et al. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Henry Ortiz initiated this action on January 2, 2025, with a pro se complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and the request is granted. This matter was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On January 8, 2025, plaintiff filed a petition for injunctive relief which the court construes as seeking a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction under Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 3.) On January 16, 2025, this case was reassigned to the undersigned magistrate judge. (ECF No. 5.) For the reasons set forth below, the complaint fails to…