Howard

Howard v. Fye

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 202524-146California1,696 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL HOWARD, No. 24-146 D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:22-cv-00064-MMD-CSD v.

MEMORANDUM*

KEN FYE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 16, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON, District Judge.***

Detective Ken Fye appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

summary judgment based on qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. U.S.C. § 1291, review de novo the district court’s denial of summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.