Boub

Boub v. Prime Healthcare CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 2025B334972California2,607 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mori, J.

Filed 1/23/25 Boub v. Prime Healthcare CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THEODORE BOUB, B334972

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STCV44375) v.

PRIME HEALTHCARE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gail Killefer, Judge. Reversed. Baker & Hostetler, Shareef S. Farag, and Kerri H. Sakaue, for Defendant and Appellant. Brent S. Buchsbaum, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

__________________________ Defendant Prime Healthcare (Prime) appeals from an order granting plaintiff Theodore Boub’s motion to withdraw from arbitration and proceed in court. The trial court found, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.97,1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.