Durand

Durand v. Beitchman CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 2025B329298California3,977 words

Opinion

Opinion

Adams, J.

Filed 1/23/25 Durand v. Beitchman CA2/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

RUDY DURAND, B329298

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC648317) v.

DAVID BEITCHMAN et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Douglas W. Stern, Judge. Reversed. Gilbert Azafrani for Plaintiff and Appellant. Seanez Legal, Olga Michelle Seanez; Beitchman & Zekian and Rouben Varozian for Defendants and Respondents. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Plaintiff and appellant Rudy Durand appeals from an order dismissing the underlying action for failure to prosecute.1 Durand contends the trial court erred in granting dismissal while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.