Dayna R. Catchings v. The City of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAYNA R. CATCHINGS, CV 19-9480 DSF (AGR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES

THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et MAGISTRATE JUDGE al., Defendants.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint and amended complaints, including the operative Second Amended Complaint, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgement (“Motion”), Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“Report”), Plaintiff’s “Response in Opposition to the Proposed Recommendation,” which the Court construes as Objections to the Report (“Objections”), and other relevant records on file. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the portions of the Report to which Objections were directed. Although not required, the Court briefly addresses the following. See United States v. Ramos, 65 F.4th 427, 434 (9th Cir. 2023) (“the district court ha[s] no obligation to provide individualized analysis of each objection”); Wang v. Masaitis, 416 F.3d 992, 1000 (9th Cir. 2005) (affirming a cursory district court order summarily…