Arevalos

(PC) Hackworth v. Arevalos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20251:19-cv-01362California624 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT HACKWORTH, No. 1:19-CV-01362-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING HACKWORTH’S

MOTION FOR TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS

13 v. Docs. 170, 171, 173 14 E. AREVALOS, 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 19 Plaintiff Robert Hackworth (“Hackworth”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in which he asserted First and 21 Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant E. Arevalos (“Arevalos”), a correctional officer 22 employed by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The case proceeded to 23 a jury trial, and the jury returned a verdict for Hackworth on both claims, awarding Hackworth 24 both compensatory and punitive damages. Docs. 157, 158. Arevalos filed a post-trial motion 25 under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 59(a) for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, 26 or, alternatively, a new trial. Doc. 165. Hackworth was granted an extension of time to 27 February 10, 2025, to file his opposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.