Hipschman

Hipschman v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20253:22-cv-00903California694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLINA HIPSCHMAN, an Case No.: 22-cv-00903-AJB-BLM individual; ALEXANDER HIPSCHMAN, 12 an individual, ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs, OBJECTION AND EX PARTE

MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

14 v. (Doc. Nos. 140, 142) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Notice of Objection and Motion for Review regarding Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major’s Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel County to Provide Training Materials, (Doc. No. 140, “Objection”), as well as Plaintiffs’ ex parte motion regarding its Objection, (Doc. No. 142, “Ex Parte Motion”). For the following reasons, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ Objection and Ex Parte Motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND On December 11, 2024, Judge Major denied Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel County to Provide Training Materials. (Doc. No. 137, “Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel” or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.