Hipschman

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CAROLINA HIPSCHMAN, an Case No.: 22-cv-00903-AJB-BLM individual; ALEXANDER HIPSCHMAN, 12 an individual, ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ 13 Plaintiffs, OBJECTION AND EX PARTE

MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

14 v. 15 (Doc. Nos. 140, 142) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Notice of Objection and Motion for Review regarding 20 Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major’s Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel County 21 to Provide Training Materials, (Doc. No. 140, “Objection”), as well as Plaintiffs’ ex parte 22 motion regarding its Objection, (Doc. No. 142, “Ex Parte Motion”). For the following 23 reasons, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ Objection and Ex Parte Motion WITHOUT 24 PREJUDICE. 25 I. BACKGROUND 26 On December 11, 2024, Judge Major denied Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel County 27 to Provide Training Materials. (Doc. No. 137, “Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to 28 Compel” or…