Lineberry

Lineberry v. AddShopper, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20253:23-cv-01996California1,917 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 8 ABBY LINEBERRY, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01996-VC (PHK) 9 Plaintiffs,

10 v. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE DEFENDANT

11 ADDSHOPPER, INC., et al., ADDSHOPPERS’S MOTION TO

COMPEL AND DENYING WITHOUT

12 Defendants. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO QUASH

13 Re: Dkt. 151 14 15 Now before the Court is a Joint Discovery Letter Brief between Plaintiffs Abby Lineberry, 16 Terry Michael Cook, and Miguel Cordero (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant AddShoppers 17 Inc. (“AddShoppers”). [Dkt. 151]. Defendant AddShoppers requests that the Court deny Plaintiffs’ 18 request for a protective order and requests that the Court issue an order compelling third party Greg 19 Dessart to sit for a deposition. Id. Plaintiffs request a “protective order to prevent [Defendant] 20 AddShoppers from deposing Mr. [Greg] Dessart[.]” Id. After carefully reviewing the Joint 21 Discovery Letter Brief and all relevant documents, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.