Carey
Carey v. Torres
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CECILIA CAREY, Case No. 24-cv-07354-TSH Plaintiff, y. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE MAURICIO TORRES, Defendant. 11 On December 20, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff Cecilia Carey’s First Amended Complaint, finding it deficient under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). ECF No. 8. The Court directed 14 || Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint by January 17, 2025, warning that if she failed to do so, this case would likely be reassigned to a district judge with a recommendation for dismissal. a 16 || Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond.
The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 || (1962). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff Cecilia Carey to show cause why this case 20 || should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to…