Carey

Carey v. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20254:24-cv-09534California3,447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CECILIA CAREY and KARREN Case No. 24-cv-09534-TSH

MOORER,

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

9 v. APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND SCREENING MAURICIO TORRES, et al., COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E) Defendants.

14 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Cecilia Carey and Karren Moorer initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint (ECF No. 1) and applications to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 2, 3). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the applications but finds the complaint deficient under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). No later than February 24, 2025, Plaintiffs must file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in this screening order. If Plaintiffs fail to cure these deficiencies, the case will be reassigned to a district judge with a recommendation for dismissal. II. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.