McKenzie

McKenzie v. Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20251:23-cv-01620California807 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAMINA MCKENZIE, et al. Case No. 1:23-cv-01620-KES-CDB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

13 v. PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT WITH

PREJUDICE

14 SOCIAL SECURITY 15 ADMINISTRATION, Doc. 6

16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiffs Adamina McKenzie and Elliot McKenzie initiated this action by filing of a 19 complaint against the Social Security Administration on November 17, 2023. Doc. 1. Plaintiffs 20 proceed pro se and in forma pauperis in this matter. Docs. 1, 4. 21 On January 22, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge conducted a screening of plaintiffs’ 22 complaint and issued findings and recommendations to dismiss the complaint with prejudice and 23 without leave to amend for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Doc. 6. Specifically, the assigned 24 magistrate judge found no basis for waiving the Social Security Administration’s sovereign 25 immunity. Doc. 6. Separately, the magistrate judge noted that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.