Kies

Kies v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20253:24-cv-00710California691 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BETHANY K., Case No.: 24cv710-LR

Plaintiff,

ORDER REQUIRING

v. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON

JOINT MOTION FOR AWARD OF

MICHELLE KING,

ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. [ECF No. 18] 16 17 Presently before the Court is the parties’ “Joint Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees, Costs, and Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA).” (ECF No. 18.) The parties jointly move the Court to award Plaintiff Bethany K. attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. (See id.) Under the EAJA, a litigant is entitled to attorney fees and costs if: “(1) he is the prevailing party; (2) the government fails to show that its position was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust; and (3) the requested fees and costs are reasonable.” Carbonell v. I.N.S., 429 F.3d 894, 898 (9th Cir. 2005). In

27 1 Pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.