Sanderlin

Sanderlin v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20255:20-cv-04824California1,706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 DERRICK SANDERLIN, et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-04824-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., [ECF No. 148] Defendants.

13 On December 9, 2024, Plaintiffs sought leave to file a partial motion for reconsideration of this Court’s Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 122), specifically as it pertained to Plaintiffs’ Bane Act claims. ECF No. 138. Although Plaintiffs failed to make the showing required by Civil Local Rule 7-9, which governs administrative motions for leave to file a motion for reconsideration, the Court sua sponte granted leave to file the partial motion for reconsideration anyway. ECF No. 145. I. LEGAL STANDARD Pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “any order or other decision, however designated, that adjudicates fewer than all the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.