Estes

Estes v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20253:24-cv-01190California418 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCOS ESTES, Case No.: 3:24-cv-1190-RSH-SBC Booking #24722637, 12

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, KELLY

15

MARTINEZ, OFFICER LOPEZ,

16 MULTIPLE UNKNOW DEPUTIES,

PALOMAR COLLEGE POLICE

17

DEPARTMENT

18 Defendants. 19 20 On July 10, 2024, Marcos Estes (“Plaintiff”), a detainee proceeding pro se, filed a 21 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging Defendants violated his 22 constitutional rights when they detained and/or took him into custody on three different 23 occasions. See ECF No. 1. On November 22, 2024, the Court entered an Order granting 24 Plaintiff’s IFP application but dismissed the Complaint without prejudice and with leave 25 to amend. See ECF No. 3. On the same day, the Court mailed the Order to the two addresses 26 Plaintiff listed in his Complaint. See ECF No. 1 at 8. The Court gave Plaintiff until January 27 6, 2025 to file an amended complaint that cured the pleading deficiencies identified in the 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.