Unknown

(PC) Howard v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20251:24-cv-00429California3,298 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABDUL HOWARD, No. 1:24-cv-00429-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION UNKNOWN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Defendant. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

CLAIM FOR RELIEF

16 (ECF No. 23) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed November 15, 2024. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.