Dean

Dean v. Appelate Defenders

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20253:24-cv-02173California2,958 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ANTHONY DEAN, Case No.: 24-cv-2173-MMA (KSC)

CDCR #BT-2698,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

APPELLATE DEFENDERS, et al., 15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 12]

2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM;

AND

19 [Doc. No. 1]

3) DENYING AS MOOT

REMAINING MOTIONS

[Doc. Nos. 10–11, 15, 18, 20] 24 On November 18, 2024, Plaintiff David Anthony Dean, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, accompanied by a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), a motion for service, two notices of lodgment, and three declarations. Doc. Nos. 1–8. On December 11, 2024, the Court denied IFP, denied the motion for service, and dismissed this action without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement. Doc. No. 9. Plaintiff has since filed two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.