Dean

Dean v. Appelate Defenders

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20253:24-cv-02173California2,958 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID ANTHONY DEAN, Case No.: 24-cv-2173-MMA (KSC)

CDCR #BT-2698,

12

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO 14

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

APPELLATE DEFENDERS, et al., 15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 12] 16

17 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM;

18

AND

19 [Doc. No. 1] 20

21 3) DENYING AS MOOT

REMAINING MOTIONS

22

23 [Doc. Nos. 10–11, 15, 18, 20] 24 25 On November 18, 2024, Plaintiff David Anthony Dean, a state prisoner proceeding 26 pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, accompanied by a 27 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), a motion for service, two notices of 28 lodgment, and three declarations. Doc. Nos. 1–8. On December 11, 2024, the Court 1 denied IFP, denied the motion for service, and dismissed this action without prejudice for 2 failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement. Doc. No. 9. Plaintiff has since filed two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.