Dean
Dean v. Appelate Defenders
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20253:24-cv-02173California2,958 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ANTHONY DEAN, Case No.: 24-cv-2173-MMA (KSC)
CDCR #BT-2698,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;
APPELLATE DEFENDERS, et al., 15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 12]
2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM;
AND
19 [Doc. No. 1]
3) DENYING AS MOOT
REMAINING MOTIONS
[Doc. Nos. 10–11, 15, 18, 20] 24 On November 18, 2024, Plaintiff David Anthony Dean, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, accompanied by a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), a motion for service, two notices of lodgment, and three declarations. Doc. Nos. 1–8. On December 11, 2024, the Court denied IFP, denied the motion for service, and dismissed this action without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement. Doc. No. 9. Plaintiff has since filed two…