Regal

Regal v. County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20255:22-cv-04321California584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DEVIN REGAL, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04321-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

v. TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER

PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., SEALED Defendants. [Re: ECF 114]

13 14

16 Plaintiffs have filed an administrative motion to consider whether materials designated confidential by Defendant County of Santa Clara (“County”) should be filed under seal. See Pls.’ Mot., ECF 114. The materials in question have been submitted as exhibits to Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and referenced in Plaintiffs’ opposition brief, which have been filed provisionally under seal on the public docket. As the designating party, the County has the obligation to file a statement demonstrating that the materials satisfy the applicable standard for sealing. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(f)(3). Because the materials are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.