Regal
Regal v. County of Santa Clara
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 DEVIN REGAL, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04321-BLF
9 Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
10 v. TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
11 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., SEALED 12 Defendants. [Re: ECF 114]
13 14 15
16 17 Plaintiffs have filed an administrative motion to consider whether materials designated 18 confidential by Defendant County of Santa Clara (“County”) should be filed under seal. See Pls.’ 19 Mot., ECF 114. The materials in question have been submitted as exhibits to Plaintiffs’ 20 opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and referenced in Plaintiffs’ opposition 21 brief, which have been filed provisionally under seal on the public docket. 22 As the designating party, the County has the obligation to file a statement demonstrating 23 that the materials satisfy the applicable standard for sealing. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(f)(3). Because 24 the materials are…