Reyes
Reyes v. Arce
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUGUSTINE REYES, Case No. 24-cv-06654 BLF (PR) 11 Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
12 v. 13
14 CARLOS ARCE, et al., 15 Defendants.
16
17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se “pre[e]mptory writ of mandamoir [sic] 19 prohibition pursuant to CCP §§ 1085, 1086, 1103, 1104 & 1095,” and requesting an 20 immediate stay.1 Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 21 will be addressed in a separate order. For the reasons discussed below, the instant action 22 will be dismissed. 23 24 DISCUSSION 25 Plaintiff claims that Warden Carlos Arce is failing to follow “all statutes, 26 regulations, laws, and [Department] Operations procedures governing the placement [and] 27 1 transferring classification of [Plaintiff] to the appropriate safe security with reasonable 2 consideration [for] his special needs, yard case factors, enemies, STGs affiliations, and his 3 threaten safety concerns regarding the STG attacks on his life.” Dkt. No. 1 at 1. Plaintiff 4 seeks…