(PC) Buckhanan v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20251:24-cv-00811California2,080 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 XAVIER BUCKHANAN, Case No. 1:24-cv-0811 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. 23) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

16 Xavier Buckhanan is proceeding pro se in this action, filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1267. The Court dismissed the action after finding Plaintiff failed to prosecute the matter and failed to comply with the Court’s order. (Doc. 21.) Plaintiff now seeks reconsideration of the dismissal pursuant to Rule 60(b), asserting “excusable neglect and extraordinary circumstances” warrant relief. (Doc. 23 at 1.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED without prejudice. I. Background Plaintiff filed the instant action on May 30, 2024, in the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.