Paiva
Paiva v. Colvin
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMILIA MONICA P., Case No.: 3:25-CV-00116-AHG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
13 v.
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
14 CAROLYN COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL [ECF No. 2] 15
SECURITY,
16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 On January 17, 2025, Plaintiff Emilia Monica P. (“Plaintiff”) brought this action 24 against the acting Commissioner of Social Security, seeking judicial review of the 25 Commissioner’s final administrative decision denying her applications for Social Security 26 disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. ECF No. 1. Along with her 27 Complaint, Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 28 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. 1 I. LEGAL STANDARD 2 A motion to proceed IFP presents two issues for the Court’s consideration. First, the 3 Court must determine whether an applicant properly shows an inability to pay the 4 $4051 civil filing fee required by…