(HC) Vera v. 5th Appelate District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20251:24-cv-01045California1,241 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 G. MEMO VERA, Case No. 1:24-cv-1045 JLT SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

13 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, v. AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 14 ENTER JUDGMENT AND CLOSE CASE 5th APPELLATE DISTRICT, 15 (Doc. 5) Respondent. 16 ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

17 18 G. Memo Vera is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition 19 for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, asserting he is indigent and “entitle[d] to 20 free copies to further his Appeal.” (Doc. 1 at 3.) The magistrate judge performed a preliminary 21 review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. (Doc. 5.) 22 The magistrate judge found Petitioner failed to state a cognizable claim for habeas relief, 23 because his request for “this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.