John Roe CF 85 v. DOE 1, a corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20255:24-cv-02356California4,403 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 Lauren A. Welling (SBN: 291813) lwelling@sssfirm.com 2 Sarah Kissel Meier (SBN: 305315) skmeier@sssfirm.com 3 SLATER SLATER SCHULMAN LLP 8383 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 255 4 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Telephone: (310) 341-2086 5 Facsimile: (310) 773-5573

6 Attorneys for Plaintiff John Roe CF 85 7 Rick Richmond (SBN 194962) 8 rrichmond@larsonllp.com Andrew E. Calderón (SBN 316673) 9 acalderon@larsonllp.com Jina Yoon (SBN 331948) 10 jyoon@larsonllp.com

LARSON LLP

11 555 South Flower Street, 30th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 12 Telephone:(213) 436-4888 Facsimile: (213) 623-2000 13 Attorneys for Defendants Doe 1, a Utah 14 corporation sole, and Doe 2, a Utah nonprofit corporation 15 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION

18

19 JOHN ROE CF 85, Case No. 5:24-cv-02356-KK-DTB

20 Plaintiff, Judge: Hon. Kenly Kiya Kato

21 vs. DISCOVERY MATTER: Magistrate Judge: David T. Bristow 22 DOE 1, a corporation; DOE 2, a corporation; DOE 3, an entity of [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 23 unknown form; and DOES 4 to 100, PROTECTIVE ORDER Inclusive, 24 Defendants.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.