Doljanin

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN-THOMAS DOLJANIN, Case No.: 24-CV-1689 JLS (SBC)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO

14 REUBIN ELLIS; SHANNON SMITH;

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

WILLIAM BERKELEY; TERRY

15

CONSIDINE; SUSAN BONANO;

(ECF No. 21) 16 RODNEY BRUCE; GEOFF POOLE;

BETH HART; SAMANTHA ADAMS;

17

HARRY TURNER; JOSEPH ELLIS;

18 IONE ELLIS; RAM HILL COUNTRY

CLUB; T2 PALMS, LLC; T1

19

HOLDINGS; T2 HOLDINGS;

20 BORREGO WATER DISTRICT, 21 Defendants. 22 23 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff John-Thomas Doljanin’s untitled Motion 24 (“Mot.,” ECF No. 21), requesting “Motion To Conitinue [sic] As per Hippa concern and 25 Americans with Disabilities Act; Privacy concern already stated[.]” Mot at 1. Plaintiff 26 asserts “[t]his case is a Negotiable Instrument case mixed with collusion, non disclosure, 27 Takings, Theft By Deception, and what looks like RICO through connections and motive.” 28 Id. Finally,…