Doljanin
Doljanin v. Ellis
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20253:24-cv-01689California992 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN-THOMAS DOLJANIN, Case No.: 24-CV-1689 JLS (SBC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO
REUBIN ELLIS; SHANNON SMITH;
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
WILLIAM BERKELEY; TERRY
CONSIDINE; SUSAN BONANO;
(ECF No. 21) RODNEY BRUCE; GEOFF POOLE;
BETH HART; SAMANTHA ADAMS;
HARRY TURNER; JOSEPH ELLIS;
IONE ELLIS; RAM HILL COUNTRY
CLUB; T2 PALMS, LLC; T1
HOLDINGS; T2 HOLDINGS;
BORREGO WATER DISTRICT, Defendants. 22 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff John-Thomas Doljanin’s untitled Motion (“Mot.,” ECF No. 21), requesting “Motion To Conitinue [sic] As per Hippa concern and Americans with Disabilities Act; Privacy concern already stated[.]” Mot at 1. Plaintiff asserts “[t]his case is a Negotiable Instrument case mixed with collusion, non disclosure, Takings, Theft By Deception, and what looks like RICO through connections and motive.” Id. Finally,…