Smith v. George Brown Fitness

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20251:24-cv-01561California2,699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-01561-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

GEORGE BROWN FITTNESS, et al., ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A

Defendants. DISTRICT JUDGE

(ECF No. 1)

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Candace Smith, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on December 18, 2024. Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case at any time if the Court determines the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Lopez…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.