Smith v. George Brown Fitness

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-01561-SAB

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

14 GEORGE BROWN FITTNESS, et al., ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A

15 Defendants. DISTRICT JUDGE

16 (ECF No. 1)

17 FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

18

19 Plaintiff Candace Smith, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on 20 December 18, 2024. Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. 21 I. 22 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 23 Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case at any 24 time if the Court determines the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim 25 on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune 26 from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Lopez…