Smith v. George Brown Fitness
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20251:24-cv-01561California2,699 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-01561-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE
GEORGE BROWN FITTNESS, et al., ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A
Defendants. DISTRICT JUDGE
(ECF No. 1)
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Candace Smith, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on December 18, 2024. Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case at any time if the Court determines the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Lopez…