Parrish

(PC) Townsend v. Parrish

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20252:22-cv-01278California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH TOWNSEND, No. 2:22-cv-1278 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

P. PARRISH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding without an attorney. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion seeking a court order preventing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) from transferring him to High Desert State Prison. ECF No. 15. No opposition was filed. “A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish [(1)] that he is likely to succeed on the merits, [(2)] that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, [(3)] that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and [(4)] that an injunction is in the public interest.” Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008) (citations omitted). The standard for issuing a temporary restraining order is essentially the same as that for 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.