(SS) Bonkofsky v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20252:23-cv-02690California5,279 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARBARA L. BONKOFSKY, No. 2:23-cv-2690 AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16

17 18 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 19 (“Commissioner”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under 20 Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34.1 For the reasons that follow, 21 plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be DENIED, and defendant’s cross-motion for 22 summary judgment will be GRANTED. 23 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 24 Plaintiff was found disabled on June 13, 2012. Administrative Record (“AR”) 29.2 On 25 September 6, 2016, it was determined that plaintiff was no longer disabled as of September 1, 26 1 DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance Program, and 27 who suffer from a mental or physical disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1); Bowen v. City of New York, 476…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.