(SS) Bonkofsky v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20252:23-cv-02690California5,279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARBARA L. BONKOFSKY, No. 2:23-cv-2690 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be DENIED, and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff was found disabled on June 13, 2012. Administrative Record (“AR”) 29. On September 6, 2016, it was determined that plaintiff was no longer disabled as of September 1, 26 DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance Program, and who suffer from a mental or physical disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1); Bowen v. City of New York, 476…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.