Buratovich

(PC) Tufono v. Buratovich

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20252:23-cv-02986California690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARVELLO L. TUFONO, No. 2:23-cv-2986-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND BURATOVICH, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who was a county inmate when this case was initiated, proceeds without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2024, defendants filed a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status and to require payment of the filing fee for this case. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. On July 15, 2024, the court advised plaintiff that motions would be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). (ECF No. 19 at 6.) In addition, by order filed November 5, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to file a response to the defendants’ pending motion or face dismissal of this action. (ECF No. 23.) The time granted has expired, and plaintiff has not complied with the order or otherwise responded to the court. In addition, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.