Clark v. Barrett Business Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE B. CLARK,
Plaintiff, No. 2:24-cv-01619-TLN-CKD
13 v. ORDER
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.;
15 and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants, 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Kyle B. Clark’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 31.) Defendant Barrett Business Services, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff did not file a reply. Also before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed an opposition. (ECF No. 36.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 41.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand and GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from an employment dispute. Defendant provides payroll administration, workers’ compensation insurance, staffing and consulting services and employed Plaintiff as a 4 …