Clark v. Barrett Business Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20252:24-cv-01619California4,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE B. CLARK,

Plaintiff, No. 2:24-cv-01619-TLN-CKD

13 v. ORDER

BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.;

15 and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants, 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Kyle B. Clark’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 31.) Defendant Barrett Business Services, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff did not file a reply. Also before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed an opposition. (ECF No. 36.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 41.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand and GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from an employment dispute. Defendant provides payroll administration, workers’ compensation insurance, staffing and consulting services and employed Plaintiff as a 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.