(HC) Shove v. State of California

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THEODORE CHURCHILL SHOVE Sr., Case No. 2:24-cv-1976-JDP (P) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner, brought this action under section 2254. ECF No. 1. In 18 screening the initial complaint, I found that the claims appeared time-barred insofar as the 19 conviction petitioner is attacking occurred in 2008. ECF No. 28. I gave petitioner leave to 20 amend, and he has filed an amended petition. ECF No. 31. The amended petition does nothing to 21 remedy or meaningfully address the apparent time bar. Additionally, the claims being raised are 22 essentially incomprehensible. Out of an abundance of caution and because some of petitioner’s 23 other filings are comprehensible, I will give him one final opportunity to amend. In so doing, I 24 will deny petitioner’s various outstanding motions, all of which are either frivolous or premature. 25 ECF Nos. 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, & 44. Many of these filings…