(HC) Shove v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20252:24-cv-01976California639 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THEODORE CHURCHILL SHOVE Sr., Case No. 2:24-cv-1976-JDP (P) Petitioner, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner, brought this action under section 2254. ECF No. 1. In screening the initial complaint, I found that the claims appeared time-barred insofar as the conviction petitioner is attacking occurred in 2008. ECF No. 28. I gave petitioner leave to amend, and he has filed an amended petition. ECF No. 31. The amended petition does nothing to remedy or meaningfully address the apparent time bar. Additionally, the claims being raised are essentially incomprehensible. Out of an abundance of caution and because some of petitioner’s other filings are comprehensible, I will give him one final opportunity to amend. In so doing, I will deny petitioner’s various outstanding motions, all of which are either frivolous or premature. ECF Nos. 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, & 44. Many of these filings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.