Lakhvir Singh v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
532 F. App'x 738
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 201308-74800California314 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Lakhvir Singh, a citizen of India and a Sikh, seeks review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that dismissed his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the agency’s factual findings for substantial evidence. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination to deny Singh asylum based on a finding that his testimony was not credible. First, Singh gave inconsistent testimony about when and how he joined the political party that was the impetus for his alleged persecution. Further, his testimony regarding his first arrest omitted a serious form of abuse that he described in his asylum application, and his explanation for the omission was implausible. Third, he offered inconsistent evidence as to whether he had to spend several days in a hospital crying in pain as a result of his injuries or just went for treatment at a doctor’s private residence. These inconsistencies support the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.