Bennington

United States v. Bennington

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 202524-4565California206 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-4565 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:20-cr-00255-DMG-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

CARL DE VERA BENNINGTON, AKA

Carl Bennington,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Carl de Vera Bennington appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking

supervised release and imposing a time-served sentence and six months’

supervised release.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bennington’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Appellant has

not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.