Bennington
United States v. Bennington
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 23 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-4565 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:20-cr-00255-DMG-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
CARL DE VERA BENNINGTON, AKA
Carl Bennington,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 22, 2025**
Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
Carl de Vera Bennington appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking
supervised release and imposing a time-served sentence and six months’
supervised release.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bennington’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Appellant has
not…