Nawab

Nawab v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 202523-1879California916 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EUSOOF NAWAB, No. 23-1879 Agency No. Petitioner, A096-661-953 v. MEMORANDUM*

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 15, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.***

Petitioner Eusoof Nawab, a native of Burma and citizen of Germany, petitions

for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. determination of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.