Nawab
Nawab v. McHenry
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 202523-1879California916 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 24 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EUSOOF NAWAB, No. 23-1879 Agency No. Petitioner, A096-661-953 v. MEMORANDUM*
JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 15, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: RAWLINSON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.***
Petitioner Eusoof Nawab, a native of Burma and citizen of Germany, petitions
for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. determination of an…