Ormene

Ormene v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 202523-3494California368 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 24 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSNEL ORMENE, No. 23-3494 Agency No. Petitioner, A209-869-354 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 21, 2025** San Diego, California

Before: WALLACE, McKEOWN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Osnel Ormene, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“Board”) decision affirming an immigration

judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.