Slack

Slack v. Kariko

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202523-1509California332 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TOMMIE SLACK, No. 23-1509 D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05508-RSM Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

SARAH KARIKO, Dr.; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Former Washington state prisoner Tommie Slack appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth

Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We may affirm

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). on any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.