People v. Draughn CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 2025C100631California1,727 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 1/27/25 P. v. Draughn CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Tehama) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100631

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 23CR000733)

v.

DAVID BRENDON DRAUGHN,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant David Brendon Draughn appeals after the trial court resentenced him to correct an unauthorized sentence. Defendant contends the trial court failed to: (1) impose a single aggregate sentence for both of his criminal cases at the resentencing hearing; and (2) properly award credit for time he had already served in custody. The People respond that the trial court: (1) properly imposed a single aggregate sentence, as evidenced by the abstract of judgment; and (2) subsequently corrected its error…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.