People v. Draughn CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Mesiwala, J.
Filed 1/27/25 P. v. Draughn CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Tehama) ----
THE PEOPLE, C100631
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 23CR000733)
v.
DAVID BRENDON DRAUGHN,
Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant David Brendon Draughn appeals after the trial court resentenced him to correct an unauthorized sentence. Defendant contends the trial court failed to: (1) impose a single aggregate sentence for both of his criminal cases at the resentencing hearing; and (2) properly award credit for time he had already served in custody. The People respond that the trial court: (1) properly imposed a single aggregate sentence, as evidenced by the abstract of judgment; and (2) subsequently corrected its error…