Wilson

United States v. Wilson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202524-3413California287 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3413 D.C. No. 4:23-cr-00111-BMM-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JACOB EDWIN WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Jacob Edwin Wilson appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the $7,000 restitution award imposed following his guilty-plea

conviction for false information and hoaxes, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1038(a)(1).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate the order of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). restitution and remand.

As the government concedes, the district court erred by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.