Neman

United States v. Neman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202524-3231California374 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3231 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:13-cr-00289-ODW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

SHERVIN NEMAN, AKA Shervin Davatgarzadeh,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Shervin Neman appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

request for early termination of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). see United States v. Emmett, 749 F.3d 817, 819 (9th Cir. 2014), we affirm.

Neman argues that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.