United States v. Johnson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202524-3916California360 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3916 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:09-cr-05703-DGE-2 v.

LAWANDA JOHNSON, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington David G. Estudillo, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

LaWanda Johnson appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying her

second petition for a writ of error coram nobis and her motions seeking relief from

that order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo,

United States v. Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9th Cir. 2007), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We agree with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.