Abdul-Salam

United States v. Abdul-Salam

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202524-4753California308 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-4753 D.C. No. 4:21-cr-06042-MKD-12 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AMAR F. ABDUL-SALAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Mary K. Dimke, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Amar F. Abdul-Salam appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and sentence of 12 months and 1 day for

multiple counts of mail fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 1341, 1343, 1347, and 1349.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Abdul-Salam’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), stating that there…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.