Farmer

Farmer v. State of Oregon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202523-3401California418 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK JAMES FARMER, No. 23-3401 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00957-AN Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

STATE OF OREGON; OREGON STATE

BAR ASSOCIATION; OREGON

HEALTH AUTHORITY; OREGON

STATE HOSPITAL; Dr. DANIEL

BRYNOLF; TERRI TYSON-

FERNANDEZ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Adrienne C. Nelson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Mark James Farmer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various claims relating to

psychological evaluations and medical care. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.