Bautista-Vasquez

Bautista-Vasquez v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202523-1988California438 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANABELLY SUSANA BAUTISTA- No. 23-1988 VASQUEZ; et al., Agency Nos.

A215-702-671

Petitioners, A215-702-670 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 22, 2025**

Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Anabelly Susana Bautista-Vasquez and her minor son, natives and citizens

of Guatemala, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.