People v. Pinto CA2/6

Filed 1/27/25 P. v. Pinto CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B324271 (Super. Ct. No. 19F-09106) Plaintiff and Respondent, (San Luis Obispo County)

v.

ADRIAN OSWALD PINTO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant Adrian Oswald Pinto appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of forcible rape and sexual penetration by foreign object. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant met Lindsey Doe at the tanning salon where she worked. He came in nearly every day and they frequently chatted. On Halloween a few months after they met, they exchanged text messages and met up at a bar called the Frog and Peach,…