Swanger

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CLINTON S.,1 Case No.: 21-cv-1359-MMP

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

10 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 11 MICHELLE KING, Acting Commissioner

of Social Security,2 12 [ECF No. 26] Defendant. 13 14 15 Pending before the Court is a Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 16 406(b), in which Matthew Holmberg of the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., 17 CPC (“Counsel”) requests an award of fees for representing Clinton S. (“Plaintiff”) in 18 connection with this Social Security appeal. [ECF No. 26.] Neither the Commissioner of 19 Social Security, nor Plaintiff has objected to the pending motion. [See ECF No. 29.] The 20 parties have consented to the undersigned for all purposes. [ECF No. 31.] Pursuant to Civil 21 Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion suitable for determination without oral 22 argument. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART the motion.…